Other meanings of Torture
Law & Human Rights
Torture is the deliberate infliction of severe physical or psychological suffering on a person, typically to obtain information, punish, intimidate, or coerce. It is universally condemned under international law, prohibited by treaties such as the UN Convention against Torture, and considered a jus cogens norm from which no derogation is permitted.
Torture is defined in Article 1 of the UN Convention against Torture as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for purposes such as obtaining information, punishment, intimidation, or coercion, when inflicted by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official. The prohibition is absolute and non-derogable, applying even in times of war or public emergency.
The UN Human Rights Committee has clarified that the prohibition extends to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, and that states must criminalize torture, investigate allegations, and provide redress to victims. Regional instruments, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, reinforce this framework, and the International Criminal Court treats torture as a crime against humanity.
Historically, torture was a routine part of legal proceedings in many societies, used to extract confessions or evidence. In ancient Greece and Rome, slaves were tortured because their testimony was not considered valid unless coerced. The Inquisition employed torture to root out heresy, and many European legal systems used it until the Enlightenment.
The 18th-century philosopher Cesare Beccaria argued against torture in his influential work On Crimes and Punishments (1764), leading to its abolition in several European states. By the 19th century, most Western countries had formally abolished judicial torture, though its use persisted in colonial contexts and continues in various forms today.
Despite legal prohibitions, torture has been used in modern conflicts and counterterrorism operations. The CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques after 9/11, including waterboarding, were widely condemned as torture, and the Senate Intelligence Committee report (2014) concluded that these methods were ineffective and sometimes produced false information.
The "ticking bomb" scenario is a recurring ethical debate: whether torture can be justified to prevent an imminent attack. Most legal scholars and human rights organizations reject any exception, arguing that the prohibition is absolute and that such scenarios are rarely, if ever, real. Empirical studies show that torture often yields unreliable information, undermining its purported utility.
Beyond the well-known cases, torture has been documented in lesser-known contexts. For example, the Greek military junta (1967–1974) used systematic torture, and the European Court of Human Rights in Ireland v. United Kingdom (1978) ruled that the "five techniques" used in Northern Ireland constituted inhuman and degrading treatment, though not torture—a distinction later criticized.
Psychological torture, such as sleep deprivation and sensory overload, is often underreported because it leaves no physical scars. The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has highlighted the use of "white torture" in solitary confinement, which can cause severe mental harm. Additionally, torture is used not only by states but also by non-state actors, including terrorist groups and criminal organizations, complicating legal accountability.
This article focuses on the legal and ethical dimensions of torture as defined in international law.
Help improve the encyclopedia. Reports go straight to the site manager.