← New search

Other meanings of Roe v. Wade

U.S. constitutional law

Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade was the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that state laws criminalizing abortion were unconstitutional, subject to a framework that varied with pregnancy stage; the decision was overruled by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in 2022.1

1973
decision issued
January 22
7–2
vote in Roe
majority
2022
overruled by
Dobbs
1

Case and constitutional question

Roe v. Wade arose from a Texas criminal-abortion law challenged by a pregnant woman using the pseudonym Jane Roe. The plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, was represented by attorneys Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee; Henry Wade was the Dallas County district attorney defending the statute. The law generally made it a crime to perform an abortion except when necessary to save the pregnant woman’s life.1

The central question was whether the Constitution protected a pregnant person’s decision to terminate a pregnancy. The Supreme Court treated the case as implicating a right of privacy, while recognizing that abortion involved competing interests in personal liberty, maternal health, and potential human life. Justice Harry Blackmun wrote the majority opinion; Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White dissented.

2

The ruling and trimester framework

The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty included a qualified abortion right. The opinion described the right as fundamental but not absolute, requiring courts to balance it against legitimate state interests. During the first trimester, the decision placed the medical judgment largely with the pregnant patient and physician; after that point, the state could regulate abortion to protect maternal health, and after viability it could prohibit abortion except when necessary for the life or health of the pregnant person.1

The trimester framework became the decision’s most recognizable feature, although later cases modified it. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the Court retained a constitutional protection for pre-viability abortion but replaced the trimester rules with an “undue burden” standard for evaluating restrictions.2

3

Constitutional and political consequences

Roe invalidated many state abortion prohibitions and made abortion a central issue in American constitutional politics. Its reasoning drew on earlier privacy cases involving marriage and contraception, including Griswold v. Connecticut, but critics argued that the Constitution did not expressly mention abortion and that the Court had improperly removed the issue from democratic debate.3 Supporters viewed the decision as protecting bodily autonomy, equality, and intimate medical choice.

Litigation after Roe addressed parental-consent rules, informed-consent requirements, public funding, clinic regulations, and abortion after viability. The Court generally allowed more regulation over time while preserving a constitutional limit on pre-viability bans. In Casey, a joint opinion by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O’Connor, and David Souter reaffirmed Roe’s “central holding” while permitting substantial regulation that did not impose an undue burden.2

4

Overruling and lesser-known aspects

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overruled Roe and Casey on June 24, 2022. The majority concluded that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and returned regulatory authority to the people and their elected representatives.4 The decision concerned a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks, rather than a direct challenge to every abortion law in the country. Its practical effect was to permit states to adopt sharply different policies, including near-total bans, broad protections, or intermediate limits.

Two procedural features are often overlooked. The case reached the Court after the pregnancy had ended, but the Court treated pregnancy as a condition capable of repetition while evading review. Also, “Jane Roe” was not the name of a specific legal doctrine: it was a pseudonym used to protect the plaintiff’s identity. McCorvey later opposed abortion, but that later position did not alter the judgment in the case.1

Glossary

Due Process Clause
The Fourteenth Amendment provision stating that states may not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Viability
The stage of pregnancy at which a fetus may potentially survive outside the uterus, with medical judgment and technology affecting the assessment.
Undue burden
The standard adopted in Planned Parenthood v. Casey for asking whether an abortion regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a person seeking a pre-viability abortion.
Overruled
A judicial determination that a prior precedent should no longer govern the legal rule in question.

Roe’s constitutional rule governed abortion regulation nationwide from 1973 until the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs.