Taxation
Profit shifting is a tax planning strategy used by multinational corporations to reduce their overall tax liability by moving profits from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax or no-tax jurisdictions. This practice, often associated with base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), exploits gaps and mismatches in tax rules to shift profits to locations where little or no economic activity occurs. While some forms of profit shifting are legal, they have drawn intense scrutiny from governments and international bodies due to their impact on public revenues and economic fairness.
Profit shifting typically involves manipulating transfer prices for intra-group transactions, such as charging high royalties or interest payments from subsidiaries in high-tax countries to affiliates in low-tax ones. Another common technique is debt loading, where a subsidiary in a high-tax jurisdiction is financed with excessive debt from a related company, generating interest deductions that reduce taxable income. Additionally, companies may locate valuable intellectual property in tax havens and then license it to operating subsidiaries, shifting profits via royalty payments. These strategies exploit differences in national tax rates and rules, often without moving real business activities.
The scale of profit shifting is substantial. Research by Tørsløv, Wier, and Zucman (2018) estimated that close to 40% of multinational profits are shifted to tax havens globally, costing governments around $200 billion in lost revenue annually. The OECD's BEPS project, launched in 2013, estimated revenue losses of $100–240 billion per year, equivalent to 4–10% of global corporate income tax revenues. Developing countries are disproportionately affected, as they rely more heavily on corporate tax revenues and often have weaker enforcement capacities. The practice also distorts competition, favoring large multinationals over domestic firms that cannot use such strategies.
In response to profit shifting, the OECD and G20 developed the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) action plan, consisting of 15 actions to address gaps in international tax rules. A key outcome was the 2021 agreement on a two-pillar solution: Pillar One reallocates taxing rights to market jurisdictions for the largest multinationals, while Pillar Two introduces a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%. The EU has also adopted anti-tax-avoidance directives, and individual countries have enacted measures such as the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's GILTI and BEAT provisions. These efforts aim to align taxation with economic substance and reduce incentives for profit shifting.
Beyond the headline techniques, profit shifting includes more obscure strategies such as 'treaty shopping', where companies route investments through countries with favorable tax treaties to reduce withholding taxes. Another edge case is the 'Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich', a now-closed arrangement that used Irish and Dutch subsidiaries to shift profits to Bermuda. Historical figures like the economist Thomas Piketty have highlighted profit shifting as a driver of wealth inequality. Additionally, profit shifting is not limited to corporations; wealthy individuals use similar structures, such as offshore trusts, to shift personal income. The practice also affects transfer pricing of intangible assets, which is notoriously difficult to value, leading to disputes and litigation.
Profit shifting remains a dynamic field as governments adapt to new corporate strategies.
Help improve the encyclopedia. Reports go straight to the site manager.