Other meanings of Encyclopédie
Enlightenment reference work
The Encyclopédie was the great French general encyclopedia published between 1751 and 1772 under the editorship of Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. Conceived as a systematic account of knowledge, it combined articles on philosophy, science, religion, law, language, commerce, and the mechanical arts with an extensive illustrated record of technologies and crafts. Its critical treatment of authority and its circulation among educated European readers made it one of the most influential publishing projects of the Enlightenment.1
The Encyclopédie arose from an ambitious attempt to produce a French adaptation of Ephraim Chambers’s Cyclopaedia, but it became a much larger and more original enterprise. The publisher André Le Breton appointed Diderot and d’Alembert to direct the project, and the first volume appeared in 1751.1 Diderot eventually became its chief editor after d’Alembert withdrew from active collaboration in 1759, partly because of controversy surrounding the work’s treatment of religion.
The Paris edition ultimately comprised 17 volumes of text, issued from 1751 to 1765, and 11 volumes of plates, completed in 1772.3 Publication was interrupted by official prohibitions, censorship, and disputes with religious authorities, yet the project continued through complex arrangements involving publishers, printers, and overseas or provincial production. Later editions and reprints helped extend its European reach.
The Encyclopédie organized knowledge as a connected system rather than a simple alphabetical inventory. Its celebrated “tree of knowledge,” adapted from Francis Bacon, divided human understanding into memory, reason, and imagination, while cross-references directed readers between apparently unrelated subjects. This structure allowed an article on a craft or scientific process to illuminate broader questions about society and human reason.
The work covered theology, mathematics, medicine, natural history, politics, music, grammar, and manufacturing. Its contributors included specialists such as the mathematician d’Alembert, the naturalist Louis-Jean-Marie Daubenton, and the political thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau, alongside many less visible authors and informants.1 Diderot’s editorial practice gave practical knowledge unusual dignity: artisans, machines, tools, and procedures received sustained attention beside abstract philosophy.
The Encyclopédie became controversial because its defense of inquiry often challenged inherited religious and political authority. The Sorbonne condemned several articles, the Jesuits attacked the project, and royal authorities suspended or prohibited its publication at different stages.1 D’Alembert’s preliminary discourse and several articles expressed a cautious but unmistakable confidence in reason, observation, and the improvement of knowledge.
Its influence did not depend on every article being novel or radical. The encyclopedia gathered specialist information into a portable reference work, popularized technical vocabulary, and made arguments available to readers beyond universities and clerical institutions. Historians therefore treat it both as a major monument of the French Enlightenment and as a collaborative publishing system shaped by censorship, patronage, commerce, and labor. Its readership also included administrators, professionals, collectors, and educated artisans.
The plates are among the Encyclopédie’s most distinctive and least appreciated features. They depict workshops, instruments, machines, military equipment, domestic manufacture, and industrial operations, sometimes preserving details that are difficult to reconstruct from surviving written descriptions.3 Their purpose was not merely decorative: visual sequences could show how a process worked and how tools related to one another.
The project also exposed tensions within Enlightenment universalism. Many entries relied on reports from colonial travel and described non-European peoples through the assumptions of eighteenth-century Europe; the work was expansive without being culturally neutral. Its cross-references could likewise be playful or subversive, directing readers toward arguments that censorship prevented editors from stating openly. Modern digital projects, including the University of Chicago’s ARTFL Encyclopédie and the University of Michigan’s digitization, make it possible to search these networks of articles, authors, and illustrations rather than reading the set only as a sequence of volumes.34
The title is given in its commonly used shortened form; the full original title begins “Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers.”
Help improve the encyclopedia. Reports go straight to the site manager.