← New search

Other meanings of Civil Constitution of the Clergy

French Revolution

Civil Constitution of the Clergy

The Civil Constitution of the Clergy was a 1790 French Revolutionary law reorganizing the Catholic Church in France. It made the clergy a salaried public body, redrew diocesan boundaries, and required priests and bishops to swear loyalty to the constitution rather than to the pope, producing a major religious and political schism.1

12 July 1790
Enacted
National Constituent Assembly
83
Constitutional dioceses
One per department
27 November 1790
Oath required
Clergy loyalty oath
1

Purpose and provisions

The Constitution aimed to place the French Church under national administrative control while preserving public religion. The National Constituent Assembly reduced the number of dioceses from roughly 135 to 83, aligning each diocese with a department and requiring bishops to be elected by local voters rather than appointed through the traditional ecclesiastical process.1 Parish priests were likewise to be chosen by voters, although candidates had to meet clerical qualifications. The state would pay clergy salaries, and religious institutions affected by the nationalization of church property would be reorganized within the new framework.

The measure drew on Gallican traditions that emphasized certain liberties of the French Church, but it went beyond earlier disputes over royal and papal authority. By treating ecclesiastical offices as public offices, it made the church’s internal government subject to revolutionary ideas of citizenship, administration, and national sovereignty.

2

The oath and the schism

The required oath transformed an administrative reform into a test of religious allegiance. On 27 November 1790, the Assembly ordered clergy to swear fidelity to the nation, the law, the king, and the constitution; priests who refused could lose their salaries and offices.2 Pope Pius VI condemned the Constitution in 1791, objecting especially to elections of bishops and priests without papal authorization.

Clergy who accepted became known as constitutional or juror priests, while those who rejected the oath were called refractory, nonjuring, or unsworn priests. The division spread through parishes, families, and local communities. Many Catholics continued to regard nonjuring priests as the legitimate clergy, while revolutionary authorities increasingly regarded them as politically suspect. The conflict therefore joined theological obedience to questions of law, citizenship, and counter-revolution.

3

Implementation and repeal

Implementation was uneven because the law depended on local elections, state enforcement, and cooperation from clergy who often rejected its terms. In early 1791, constitutional bishops and priests were elected and installed, but the papal condemnation made their canonical status controversial. The Assembly and later revolutionary governments responded with increasingly coercive measures against nonjuring clergy, including surveillance, expulsion, imprisonment, and, during the Terror, executions in some circumstances.3

The Constitution was effectively superseded when the National Convention separated church and state in 1795, although religious policy remained unstable. Napoleon Bonaparte’s Concordat of 1801 with the Holy See ended the institutional conflict by restoring a recognized relationship between the French state and the Catholic Church. The Concordat did not simply revive the old order: it retained state payment of clergy and accepted important consequences of the Revolution.

4

Lesser-known aspects

The Constitution’s most disruptive feature was not only its treatment of bishops but its attempt to make ordinary parishioners participants in clerical selection. Voters who might not share the faith were nevertheless involved in choosing religious officeholders, a practice that exposed the tension between universal political citizenship and sacramental authority. The redrawing of dioceses also made the departmental map a template for ecclesiastical geography, reducing the institutional weight of older diocesan and metropolitan traditions.1

The oath divided clergy more sharply than a simple state-versus-church model suggests. Some priests accepted it while privately trying to preserve pastoral continuity; others refused from conviction but remained influential through clandestine ministry. Women, lay associations, and village networks helped sustain nonjuring religious practice, making the dispute a social conflict as well as a constitutional one. Later French debates over secularism, religious freedom, and the authority of the state continued to recall this episode.

Glossary

Constitutional clergy
Clergy who swore the required oath and served within the church reorganized by the revolutionary state.
Refractory clergy
Priests and bishops who refused the oath; also called nonjuring or unsworn clergy.
Gallicanism
A tradition emphasizing distinctive rights and autonomy of the French Church in relation to papal authority.
Concordat of 1801
An agreement between Napoleon Bonaparte and Pope Pius VII that reestablished a regulated relationship between France and the Catholic Church.

The terms constitutional, juror, refractory, nonjuring, and unsworn reflect competing legal and religious positions during the Revolution; usage varies among historians.